EKSTROPI
EXECUTIVE DECISION BRIEF
PROJECT CINNABAR · OBS4 · CEO LENS
COMMITMENT
Integrate the two operating estates into one accountable enterprise without losing the knowledge that runs either.
ONE COMMITMENT · ONE GOVERNED REALITY · MULTIPLE LEGITIMATE EXECUTIVE READINGS
CURRENT EXECUTIVE POSITION
Two estates are being joined. One reality is not yet established.
DIRECTIONDeteriorating since OBS2
EVIDENCECurrent through 9 Sep
MATERIALITY58% evidenced by weight
Conditionally supported
Integration activity is admitted across both estates, while the crossings that carry the synergy commitment remain unevidenced.
ESI TRAJECTORY
43OBS1
42OBS2
38OBS3
35OBS4 · NOW
33N+1 · FORECAST
GOVERNED ENTERPRISE REALITY
FINANCE€7.9m of €12m synergy at riskEvidenced synergy stands at €4.1m.
TECHNICALCore consolidation unsequencedTwo ERP estates run with no committed convergence path.
DELIVERY6 of 11 integration milestones movingThe five stalled milestones all cross estate boundaries.
PEOPLE14 key holders flagged retention riskKnowledge of the acquired estate concentrates in them.
OPERATIONSCombined service model not exercisedCross-estate incident handling is asserted, not demonstrated.
GOVERNANCEIntegration authority split by legacy lineNo single owner holds a cross-estate decision end to end.
REQUIRES YOUR ATTENTION
01
Sequence the core consolidationThe synergy number stands on a convergence path that does not exist yet.
02
Secure the fourteen key holdersThe acquired estate's operating knowledge has no second custody.
03
Unify integration authorityCross-estate decisions currently need two owners and get none.
DECISION BOUNDARY
The integration commitment holds as intent. It is not yet evidenced as one enterprise.
Activity is admitted on both sides, and every synergy-bearing crossing remains unproved.
WHAT WOULD CHANGE THE POSITION
◇ A committed consolidation sequence exists◇ Key-holder custody is secured◇ One authority holds cross-estate decisions◇ The combined service model is exercised
THE DECISION IN FRONT OF THE ROOM
The decision before governance: hold the synergy commitment as made, re-phase it on the evidenced crossings, or re-set integration authority first. The commitment stands on crossings that are not yet evidenced. The four conditions above state what would move the position.